Thursday, September 26, 2013

Life is a Speck

Life is a Speck
Samuel Beckett's absurdist play, Endgame, presents a view into the lives of four survivors who go about their daily routines in an attempt to hold on to a shred of their former normality. Interspersed throughout this routine is a series of lengthy conversations that reveal the true bleakness of the post-apocalyptic environment raging outside the relative comfort of the shelter. Among these conversations is a speech delivered by Hamm, the blind and cynical man who dominates most of the dialogue, that expresses his inner feelings of insignificance. Hamm states that he, as well as his fellow survivors, is “a speck in the void” (Beckett 2954); this metaphor shows that Hamm sees himself as a miniscule entity in the vastness of the universe. The metaphor does not end there, however. The feeling of insecurity extends farther into Hamm's psyche by manifesting his views on blindness and his isolation in the ravaged world into one concise image. The metaphor is Hamm's bitter, three-pronged criticism of the world that provides audiences with an insight into the mind of the angry survivor.
Hamm's speech begins abruptly, catching the audience off guard with his sudden surge of dialogue. He delivers the speech quickly and without preparation; the sudden genesis of the speech implies that Hamm's feelings of isolation in the universe are constantly bubbling inside him, waiting only for the opportune moment to be expressed. The metaphor of being a “speck” parallels Hamm's belief that humanity and, in a direct extension of thought, the earth are merely a tiny ball of dust in the infinity of the cosmic void. This belief of insignificance is the tenor of Hamm's metaphor, while the vehicle is the speck of dust swirling in the infinite darkness. Hamm's reality is defined by these very polarizing images; he sees the world in terms of large and small, light and dark, and futile and fruitful. Hamm's metaphor does not end with just his own reality, however; by including the entirety of the world in the image, Hamm extends the insignificance of life the consciousnesses of his fellow survivors. He is not the only speck of dust floating in the void, but adding three other specks does little to diminish his feelings of insecurity.
The metaphor of isolation in the dark implies Hamm's feelings of insignificance in the universe; however, the image extends farther into Hamm's mind than the feelings of futility. Hamm is a blind individual and, knowing that, the concept of “infinite emptiness” (2954) becomes vastly more revealing. Hamm's audience knows of his disability and would be aware of the implication of an infinite darkness. Hamm lives his entire life in this isolation, knowing only the memories of sight and the sounds of the people he now spends every moment with. His consciousness and his thoughts are his metaphorical “speck in the void” (2954). Through his various speeches, Hamm attempts to shape the void around him, trying to provide more substance to the darkness. However, as his metaphor in this speech attests, nothing he can say or do can overcome the emptiness of his blindness. No manner of speech or no way of acting can reverse the damage done to his eyes. Hamm will remain a mere speck in his own physical void for the rest of his life.
In the same speech, Hamm compounds upon the isolation metaphor. He states that he and his fellow survivors are a “little bit of grit in the middle of the steppe” (2954). This addition to the metaphor adds the final layer to the overall image; Hamm's shelter is a miniscule dot in the maelstrom of post-apocalyptic nothingness raging outside the four, thin walls. Saying that the shelter is a “bit of grit” adds texture to the image Hamm is attempting to conjure; this added texture transforms the previous image of a “speck” into a physical representation of isolation. The steppe in Hamm's image is a reflection of the flat nothingness that Clov observes every day as he looks out the windows. Though the image of human perseverance in the face of apocalyptic destruction would usually be seen as a positive, Hamm spins the metaphor into a bleak and unforgiving image of the futility of human perseverance. Hamm is speaking to three other survivors; his audience is aware of the bleak conditions surrounding the shelter. The knowledge of the outside world compounds the hopeless image for Hamm's audience; their own experiences add a sense of reality to their isolation. Hamm knows this and uses these strong images of isolation to further drag his audience into believing his cynical view of life in the wasteland.
Hamm's metaphor of isolation after the destruction of society has numerous layers that depict both his inner thoughts of insignificance and his thoughts on his physical isolation from the outside world. Hamm uses these metaphors to force his world view upon his audience; he places emphasis upon the images of isolation as he growls out his speech. His audience is forced to listen to his ramblings. They are all isolated from the outside world and only have each other for company. In this case, Hamm's image of isolation in the “infinite emptiness” (2954) is accurate and further strengthens his arguments. Hamm's well constructed metaphors of isolation and insignificance are hard to deny, especially for an audience who is trapped in a post-apocalyptic shelter surrounded by the remnants of society.

Hamm's speech: http://youtu.be/nLgd1viQ9hs?t=6m25s The speech continues until 7:57. 

Monday, September 9, 2013

Rhetorical Lexicon

Literacy    

          Literacy is most commonly defined as “the ability to read and write.” In other contexts, being literate correlates with one's familiarity of the subject he/she is discussing. A great number of classical rhetoricians, such as Socrates, were illiterate and relied solely on their talents of oration and knowledge of rhetorical strategies to carry their debates and win complex court cases. It wasn't until Plato documented Socrates' speeches and lectures that classical rhetoricians had a presence in the written word. In modern times, literacy is a necessary attribute to function in everyday life. However, the introduction of social media networks, such as Facebook, has severely diminished the prominence of well-constructed and well considered arguments in the public forum. With the invention of the internet, the ability to provide one's opinion has become more readily available to the common person. As a result, social media platforms are steeped in uneducated and unedited arguments, usually rife with grammatical errors and factual discrepancies. Buried in this landslide of unintelligible bickering, the rare individual emerges who forms an argument with concise wording and the authority of one who has planned his/her arguments before publishing them to the viewing public. These uninformed and haphazard opinions were certainly common in the time of the classical rhetoricians; however, the public had no way of presenting or publishing these opinions to the more educated scholars. In antiquity, one had to study diligently and for many years to obtain the ability and the right to express their opinions in such a public setting. Today, a stable internet connection and a functioning keyboard are all one needs to address the public.
        The social networking platform “Twitter” restricts the thoughts of users to a mere 140 characters. This restriction has created a dichotomy among its users. Some users utilize the restriction as a personal challenge to create the most poignant and concise depiction of their thoughts and opinions. In direct opposition to this mindset, most users merely condense their words into abbreviations and their sentences into incoherent fragments. One must then become “Twitter literate” in order to decipher the cluster of consonants thrust into public view. Though not literacy in the classical sense, Twitter literacy has become a form of modern rhetoric. Plato and Aristotle's complex arguments and extended debates of antiquity have been replaced by the current generation's “texting lingo.” This isn't to say that literacy in modern rhetoric is a thing of the past. Twitter literacy has only joined the ranks of classical and modern literacy, not eradicated them from public knowledge. Twitter isn't the medium used for elaborate, complex, and well-planned strings of thought. Individuals on Twitter who seek to pose extended thoughts have to do so in sporadic bursts of 140 characters or fewer. For lengthier and better planned discussions, sites like tumblr and blogger have developed without character limits for text posts. The sites also feature a comment section, which fosters discussion on the original poster's published content. While literacy has become muddled and fallen from common use on most social media platforms, there are still remnants of literacy on the internet.

       Example of literacy(or the degradation of literacy) in digital media: http://www.failtweet.org/

Orality

      Orality is the concept of a strictly oral argument, discussion, or way of life. In modern digital media, orality is abundant. News broadcasts, television shows, radio broadcasts, and podcasts are all modern inventions that rely strictly upon spoken word. Newscasts feature scrolling text at the bottom of the television screen, but the bulk of the information is relayed through only the broadcaster's voice. The oral tradition compliments the modern life style perfectly; listening to news and entertainment allows individuals to do work while also being entertained or informed. The hectic lifestyle of the modern individual benefits from having a quick and easy way to stay informed on current events.
The social media platform YouTube is based almost entirely on orality. YouTube allows individuals or groups of individuals to express themselves through auditory and visual mediums, as opposed to the purely textual medium of printed news, journals, and online blogs. “Vlogging,” or video blogging, has become an increasingly popular platform for self expression. Vloggers create content within an extreme range of subjects. Certain creators stick to one subject, be it serious or of a comedic nature; others vary vlog styles from video to video. However, these blogs all have one thing in common: orality. The videos may feature textual overlays, image slideshows, or blank screens, but almost all personal vlogs feature the voice of the creator delivering a spoken message. This modern soapbox has been mounted by countless individuals and contributes to the modern oral tradition.
      Another extension of the oral tradition in modern digital media is filmed stand-up comedy. Before the popularization of video recording, stand-up comedy was an experience that required an individual's physical presence in a comedy club. However, once video recording was introduced to the stand-up scene, an individual could view several comedy routines from his/her own home. Stand-up comedy, already a tradition rooted in orality, became a household name once it became readily available to the general public. The popularity of the routines grew drastically as more people repeated jokes and recommended that their friends also watched the video. Word of mouth propelled the stand-up industry into prominence, and the comedic oral tradition flourished.
      Finally, podcasts have become a large aspect of the modern oral tradition. Podcasts, like vlogs, have a wide range of subject matter. One can download education, entertainment, or news related podcasts and carry hours of content with them on their mobile devices. Popular news outlets often publish podcasts to supplement their newscasts; NPR, CNN, and the BBC are several popular news podcasts available to listeners. The “Welcome to Night Vale” podcast is a prime example of an entertainment broadcast. The content is created specifically to entertain through stories of the fictional desert town Night Vale and the strange, Lovecraftian experiences that are commonplace for its residents. “Welcome to Night Vale” is strictly an auditory experience; there are no accompanying images or written stories to supplement the half hour narratives. Podcasts such as these are actively widening the oral tradition of modern society.
      

Examples of orality in digital media: Thoughts from Places, a series of YouTube videos published by the Vlogbrothers. These videos depict a wide range of topics, ranging from the extremely serious to the highly comedic. http://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL9EF0C1C9A93295C5